In his book God is the Gospel, John
Piper argues that the Gospel is ultimately a vision of the beauty and
desirability of God above all other desirable things. But, Piper
continues, it is possible to present the Gospel in such a way that it
simply compliments our selfish desires or assuages our fears as we
pursue our own “desirable things.” Indeed, the gospel has been
presented so often in that way to so many, that it seems nothing more
than another self-help program promising to calm our frazzled nerves.
But the calming effect that such a
gospel might bring is temporary at best. What is worse, it is a
message that does not seem to align well with the New Testament
gospel. But this is the age of stress, if it is anything, and so the
best we can imagine is relief from that stress, and it is the best
that many of our preachers and writers choose to offer. They are
simply playing to their audiences and measuring their success by
book-sales and guest-appearances on day-time television. A careful
scan of the Christian section at your local Books-a-Million will only
confirm this assessment.
Well, it is the tendency of
Christianity, and always has been, to wander from the New Testament
gospel. That alternative to which it is attracted in any particular
age becomes a sort of Christianized version of the idol of that age.
The idol of this age is perhaps simply relief from anxiety, for each
successful idol promises what we most highly desire. If our
imaginations are so limited that our highest “vision of beauty and
desirability” is merely self-satisfaction masquerading as
contentment, then that is the fulfillment our most successful
idols will promise us. But isn't it a shame that so much of the
church so willingly takes part in this masquerade?
There is a way to read the Bible that
serves to under-gird this way of thinking. You simply look for verses
that seem to promise what you desire: peace, plenty, a large family,
influence. You browse your Bible looking for these “mountain-top”
verses. You highlight them, you memorize them, and you quote them
often to others as encouragement. What can be more “Biblical”
than that?
For me, this all began to seem one
large and increasingly depressing culture-shift within Christianity.
I came to realize that the gospel that Jesus and the disciples
announced was something very different, and I was determined to hear
it whole again through the pages of the Gospels themselves, reading
them as stories—start to finish—not cherry-picking favored
verses.
I don't mean to describe myself as some
sort of lonely truth-seeker in a world of the mistaken or the
dishonest. There are many like myself. A veritable gospel-movement
seems to be taking place within the church. Something like this
critique is a part of what lies behind the missional movement in our
day, as well as all the folks who have taken to using terms like
“gospel-centered,” “gospel-driven,” or “gospel-focused”
to describe themselves. These are corrective terms that would never
have been needed if there hadn't been such widespread drift from the
message of the New Testament in our churches.
Now I w don't want to dwell any further
on this critique. The obvious next step for me was and is to go back
to the source, to Jesus himself. What did he talk about most often,
even when it was bound to get him into trouble? He talked a lot about
a kingdom, for one thing, so we will have to ask ourselves what he
meant by that, and he talked a lot about himself; about who he was
(identity), and about what he came to do (purpose).
The gospel is wrapped up in these two
questions: who was Jesus, and what did he accomplish? The answers to
these questions are in large part what Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John
were intent on communicating.
1 comment:
just reading :-)
Post a Comment